graphic border
Old 22nd December 2010, 21:37   #1
Oli Winton
Oli Winton's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: London
Posts: 3,073
Default Man U


Just seen your piece on Man U/ Man Utd in Red News. Fantastic stuff, very informative indeed as I have heard all the myths but did not know which were true.


Oli Winton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd December 2010, 22:31   #2
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Houston Texas
Posts: 1,537

Thanks Oli Merry Xmas to you and yours.
tomclare is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd December 2010, 01:05   #3
Stu Parish
Secret Agent
Stu Parish's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 781

Tom can you post on here?
Stu Parish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd December 2010, 01:05   #4
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Houston Texas
Posts: 1,537

For those of you who haven't seen it:

“Man U” or “Man Utd” – Where Did it Originate From?

Once again the old chestnut about the origination of the term “Man U” or “Man Utd” has reared its ugly head. Just a few days ago the following poster was displayed upon a FaceBook Page, and it caused quite a lot of controversy thereafter. The poster was uploaded by somebody in India who goes under the pseudonym of Red Devils In India. The controversy caused did not surprise me, simply because the poster was misleading at best, and at its worst, so inaccurate in its accusations. It is an old chestnut that rears its head, mainly with younger supporters, time and time again. Perhaps it is time to nail this myth once and for all.

There is certainly nothing sinister, nor derogatory in either term, and neither reflect anything whatsoever to do with the Munich Air Disaster. To find the roots of both of those titles, you have to go back into early part of the 1900’s, and maybe even earlier than that. They are to be found in the history of newspapers both national, and local. Back then when there were no computers, reporters at football matches would telephone their match reports in to the newspaper, and they would speak to a copy writer who would manually type down what the reporter was saying. The copy writer would then send what he had typed, down to the print room where the compositors (typesetters) would set the report manually on the print plates, ready for the presses to roll.

The reporters were actually in the lap of the Gods where the copy writers were concerned because most of those copy writers would be employed on an ad-hoc or part time basis, and sometimes, the spoken word and what was passed to the print room, differed enormously, and the finished result could be quite comical. For example, the Irish football team Crusaders once appeared in print as “Crewe Sailors”, and “chunky” Sammy Lee appeared as “junkie” Sammy Lee. “Revie shot up in the air” became “Revie **** up in the air”. Years ago when the late Polish international Kaz Deyna was leaving City it was reported that he was “going home to Warsaw because he cannot understand the language” but it appeared in the paper as “going home to Walsall.”

Probably one of the funniest examples concerned the late Frank McGhee, who for years was the Daily Mirror’s chief football writer, and on this particular occasion was covering a European cup-tie during Shankly’s era. He began dictating copy over the ‘phone to the copy taker at his newspaper; “Liverpool produced another glory night at Anfield when they crushed the pride of Italian football………..” at which point, the copy taker, a “casual”, and an Indian who was as unfamiliar with Liverpool as he was with football, stopped him. “Excuse me Mr. McGhee, but I am stopping you because your grammar is incorrect.” Now Frank was an old school type reporter and could fly off the handle very quickly, and a “casual” copy writer pulling him for grammar was something that very easily lit his fuse.
Frank roared; “What the **** are you talking about? There’s nothing wrong with my ****ing grammar ……. Just take the bleeding copy ….. the ****ing desk want it NOW!”
What dear old Frank had to listen to next was hilarious. “I am sorry Mr. McGhee, but I am insisting that you are very wrong. You are very fine writer but I am knowing from my school in Bombay that what you are saying is, gra – mat – ic – ally incorrect. You can say ‘a field’ or ‘the field’, but you most certainly must not say ‘an field!” But I digress.

Other news, and results would come in via telegraph etc, and again, these would be put together and sent down to the print room. The classified Football Results would then be set in type and in columns, a separate one for each Division of the Football League. These columns had to be uniformly aligned both horizontally and vertically. It would have been impossible to do this if the typesetters had to set in the full names of most of the clubs concerned. To alleviate this, they would use a club’s nickname i.e. Wolves, ‘Spurs, or they would abbreviate a club’s name. Sunderland for example would become S’land, Sheffield Wednesday would become Sheff Wed, Portsmouth would read as P’mouth. So a result that was to read like Middlesborough 2 Manchester United 2, would be altered to read something like, M’Boro 2 Man Utd 2. However, the end result was that all the columns would be uniformly set out and perfectly aligned when the newspaper was printed.
It was the same in later years when the results appeared on television screens, although back then, the reader would always read the abbreviation as the club’s full name, especially if it was the BBC. However, as we got into the mid ‘60’s and things got more technical, a new breed of journalist/reporter began to appear. Reporting got more sloppy and lazy, and the terms “Man U” and “Man Utd” started to be heard more and more from these people, and so it was inevitable that opposing team’s fans picked up on this. It was same when the teleprinter became a popular way of showing results on the tv – United’s name would come up and be shown as Man U or Man Utd. But these terms never, ever had anything to do with Munich, nor were they meant to be derogatory in any way. Just like the proverbial rolling stone, they have gathered stories as the years have rolled along through people who have put a slant on it to suit their own ends.

In the end, on top of lazy, sloppy journalism, it was just what the football fan saw, read, or heard that brought these terms for Manchester United into more frequent use. It is interesting to note that Big Fat Ron, even when he was managing United, has always referred to the club as “Man U.” So the real explanation for both terms is just very plain and simple.
tomclare is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd December 2010, 01:15   #5
Andrea Barton
Office Mother
Andrea Barton's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 18,992

Excellent stuff Tom! A Merry Christmas to you!
Andrea Barton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd December 2010, 10:05   #6
Rich Bruce
Mr Jo Bruce
Rich Bruce's Avatar
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Good Ol' Norn Iron
Posts: 19,127

Cheers Tom, certainly clears up a few myths (and love the mention of my own team in there, Crusaders have been called many things in their time and Crewe Sailors is probably the nicest..C'mon the Hatchett Men!!)
You may have to fight a battle more than once before you win it.
Rich Bruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd December 2010, 10:14   #7
The Forum Mistress

TanyaT's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Cornwall
Posts: 130,989

suspect there weren't any **** in the printed article!

thanks Tom, illuminating as always.

Thanks Oli for alerting us, and Tom for posting it here
Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. Martin Luther King
TanyaT is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Robert Peston : Can Man Utd spend? TanyaT WHAT THE PAPERS SAY 0 5th January 2010 13:23
Charlton: Alex, the Old Man and me TanyaT WHAT THE PAPERS SAY 0 23rd May 2009 09:57
Look and learn Liverpool: United have been here before, in 1998... and blown it TanyaT WHAT THE PAPERS SAY 0 24th March 2009 11:22
What's wrong with saying MAN U? TanyaT WHAT THE PAPERS SAY 0 14th September 2008 10:43
No Man U, Only Man Utd TanyaT WHAT THE PAPERS SAY 0 11th January 2008 10:53

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 17:25.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

The views and opinions expressed on this website are those of individual members and guests of the MUST forum and not the official policies of MUST unless explicitly stated. MUST is not responsible for the content of links to external websites.

We are the official MUFC Trust, but please don't confuse us with the Glazer-owned United. Click here to understand what this means.