graphic border
Old 25th April 2006, 09:06   #1
TanyaT
The Forum Mistress

 
TanyaT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Cornwall
Posts: 130,989
Default Fifa shown yellow card for drugs policy

Fifa shown yellow card for drugs policy
By John Goodbody
Times April 25, 2006


FIFA was warned yesterday that it must get tough on drugs or risk football becoming the pariah of international sport and thrown out of the Olympic Games.
That was the conclusion arising from an advisory opinion of the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), which delivered its long-awaited judgment on doping policy in football. Three Swiss lawyers said that Fifa’s regulations were “not in full compliance” with the World Anti-Doping Agency (Wada) code, which has been agreed by the other 34 federations of Olympic sports and backed by 185 governments.

The chief dispute is that Fifa has refused to adopt Wada’s recommended two-year ban for a serious first-time drugs offence. Football’s world governing body wanted to set its own suspensions, depending on individual cases, with the possibility of Wada appealing to the CAS if it disagreed with the length of the ban.

In recent years, there has been widespread criticism that football has refused to act seriously over drug-taking. Under the Wada code, Rio Ferdinand, the Manchester United and England defender, would have been banned for two years for failing to take a drugs test in September 2003.

Edgar Davids, Frank de Boer, Jaap Stam and Fernando Couto have also been among those players found guilty of taking hormone drugs but have been suspended for only a few months, whereas in other sports there would have been a two-year ban. The CAS panel also stated that the “standard suspension of two years is in compliance with the principle of proportionality”.

Although Fifa claimed that its stance had been vindicated, Dick Pound, the Wada president, compared such an attitude to the Americans claiming victory after they pulled out of Vietnam. In its statement, Fifa pointed out that the three Swiss lawyers who delivered the opinion had ruled that Fifa’s sanctioning of doping offences was “fully in line with Swiss law”. But Pound said that the important issue is whether football will adopt the code, as the International Olympic Committee (IOC) has insisted all sports must do.

Fifa did accept that “this legal opinion from CAS has laid the foundations for it to make the necessary adjustments to the relevant provisions [to Fifa’s anti-doping regulations] independently”. It said yesterday that it will invite the CAS panel to join the working group and “help to make these adjustments”.

Pound, whose disagreement with Sepp Blatter, the Fifa president, has become increasingly bitter since the code was drawn up in March 2003, said that it would be “awkward” for the IOC to include football in the 2008 Games if this compliance was not carried out.


http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article...150425,00.html
TanyaT is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sky TV monopoly shown the red card Paul Brooks WHAT THE PAPERS SAY 0 23rd March 2006 03:43
Fifa under siege as battle for football's soul tips towards clubs Paul Brooks WHAT THE PAPERS SAY 0 12th October 2005 05:59
Fifa tries to build bridges over drugs policy TanyaT WHAT THE PAPERS SAY 0 13th September 2005 09:13
FA risk losing £20m state funding in drugs policy row TanyaT WHAT THE PAPERS SAY 0 8th September 2005 09:11
Fifa warn FA about downgrading red cards Paul Brooks WHAT THE PAPERS SAY 0 17th August 2005 10:29


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 20:06.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

The views and opinions expressed on this website are those of individual members and guests of the MUST forum and not the official policies of MUST unless explicitly stated. MUST is not responsible for the content of links to external websites.

We are the official MUFC Trust, but please don't confuse us with the Glazer-owned United. Click here to understand what this means.